Arrangements for the assessment of applicants for Part IIII accommodat
ion vary, particularly for those currently living in their own homes.
In one outer London borough, the traditional approach, involving an in
terview with a social worker combined with medical history supplied by
the general practitioner, was supplemented by a formal multidisciplin
ary clinical assessment at a rehabilitation centre. A review of 199 ca
ses seen between 1985 and 1989 revealed that the clinical assessment d
etected apparently unknown medical problems in 158 (79%) clients, most
of which were amenable to treatment. Forty-nine out of 173 (29%) of t
he clients recommended for residential care on the basis of the social
worker's assessment alone were judged to be better placed elsewhere a
fter the complementary clinical assessment. In 25 cases (14%), the cli
ent's capacity and preference to stay in their own home appeared not t
o have been realised or taken into account by the social work assessme
nt. These results suggest that there may be a case for a programme of
formal clinical assessment for residential care applicants. The implem
entation of community care provides the opportunity for more conclusiv
e evaluative studies to be carried out.