A distressingly common occurrence is the erroneous diagnosis of hepati
c porphyria in patients with chronic abdominal pain in which either ur
inary porphyrins are elevated and/or Watson-Schwarz test is positive.
This work investigates a characteristic case and points at possible pi
tfalls in establishing a diagnosis. In the patient described, spot uri
ne analysis showed positive Watson-Schwarz test and increased porphyri
ns at three separate occasions, while normal values of precursors and
porphyrins were recorded in 24-hrs. urinary collections during four ho
spitalization periods for acute abdominal pain. Various colorimetric a
nd HPLC methods employed excluded the diagnosis of porphyria and led t
o resolving the discrepancy between home and hospital results. It was
found that the false increase in porphyrins in the spot samples emerge
d from a substance present in yeast tablets which the patient was cons
uming. The positive Watson-Schwarz test obtained was probably the resu
lt of the fact that the urine samples were concentrated with creatinin
e values exceeding 400 mg%. The case reported above, as well as studie
s carried out in three healthy volunteers and in an AIP patient, led t
o the conclusion that in order to obtain reliable results, 24-hrs. uri
nary collections should be examined, rather than spot urine samples.