GROWTH-RESPONSE AND RECOVERY OF N-15-FERTILIZER ONE AND 8 GROWING SEASONS AFTER APPLICATION TO LODGEPOLE PINE IN BRITISH-COLUMBIA

Citation
Cm. Preston et Dj. Mead, GROWTH-RESPONSE AND RECOVERY OF N-15-FERTILIZER ONE AND 8 GROWING SEASONS AFTER APPLICATION TO LODGEPOLE PINE IN BRITISH-COLUMBIA, Forest ecology and management, 65(2-3), 1994, pp. 219-229
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Forestry
ISSN journal
03781127
Volume
65
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
219 - 229
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-1127(1994)65:2-3<219:GARONO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
This paper reports plant and soil distribution of N-15 1 and 8 years a fter fertilizer application near Spillimacheen in the British Columbia interior. The experiment was originally established to test the effic acy of fertilization on snow; N-15-urea, (NH4NO3)-N-15 and (NH4NO3)-N- 15 were applied at 100 kg N ha-1 to 11-year-old lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engel M .) in January 1981. After one g rowing season (October 1981), eight of the 16 plots were destructively sampled. Total recovery of N-15 in plot trees was low, from 1.9 to 10 .1%. Recovery in understorey was comparable (2.4-3.4%), and 30.6-73.2% of N-15 was retained in the soil in organic form. The remaining eight plots were sampled in August 1988. There was a significant growth res ponse to fertilization, amounting to a 34% increase in stem volume for fertilized (ammonium nitrate or urea) versus control trees after eigh t growing seasons. Approximately two-thirds of the N-15 recovered in 1 981 could still be accounted for in plant biomass and soil. There had been little additional N-15 uptake by plot trees, but more continuing uptake by understorey. About one-fifth of N-15 recovered in 1988 was f ound outside the plot boundaries. The results are consistent with the hypotheses that (i) tree response to fertilization is largely the resu lt of the increase in photosynthetic capacity generated by the first y ear of uptake, (ii) fertilizer N, once immobilized in the soil, has lo w availability to crop trees, and (iii) the N mineralized is subject t o losses, presumably by leaching and denitrification. Strategies are n eeded for maximizing the uptake of N in the first growing season. Furt her research is recommended to determine what factors limit the uptake of available N by trees, and to quantify natural levels of leakage of mineral N from the ecosystem due to denitrification and leaching.