Am. Carlos, BONDING AND THE AGENCY PROBLEM - EVIDENCE FROM THE ROYAL AFRICAN COMPANY, 1672-1691, Explorations in economic history, 31(3), 1994, pp. 313-335
The paper focuses on the argument found extensively in the literature
that the managers of early chartered companies operated in their own s
elf-interest and thus were these companies own worst enemies. Using re
cent work from both the labor and the efficient contracts literature a
nd archival material from one of these companies-the Royal African Com
pany-I argue that the view prevalent in the literature greatly oversta
tes the level of agent opportunism. The contract between the Royal Afr
ican Company and its managers was well designed to mitigate moral haza
rd. While the Company paid a non-compensating differential, the intere
sting feature of the contract is the use of bonding. This study, while
arguing that these early chartered companies did attenuate managerial
opportunism, describes a fully functioning bonding market for manager
s. The paper also argues that the Royal African Company, because of an
inappropriate head office structure (one which was imposed on the com
pany in its charter), was unable to develop an internal trust network
between subordinate and superior which would have helped further to re
duce moral hazard. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.