S. Dee et al., CONTROL OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS TRANSMISSION - HANDLING INFECTED SEEDSTOCK, The Compendium on continuing education for the practicing veterinarian, 16(7), 1994, pp. 927
One of the greatest challenges facing practitioners is how to handle o
perations involving seedstock infected with porcine reproductive and r
espiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus. The primary vector for transmission
of the virus is the infected pig; however, seminal transfer and aeroso
l transmission may occur. Before any decisions are made regarding the
status of a herd, an understanding of PRRS virus serology is required.
Currently, the most commonly used test is the indirect fluorescent an
tibody (IFA), which measures exposure to the virus. The test cannot me
asure the level of immunity in animals, nor can it predict whether tes
ted animals are carriers of PRRS virus. Most diagnostic laboratories i
n the United States have set up the IFA test for detection of antibodi
es to the American strain of the virus only. Differences between the A
merican and European (Lelystad) strains have been reported. Serologic
data from three cases are presented to demonstrate the use of the IFA
test on a practical basis. Along with monitoring previously infected a
nimals, the use of sentinels (animals acquired from another herd that
are equal in health status to the infected herd and negative for PRRS
virus) can be helpful. The following criteria will be met if the virus
does not actively spread within the population: titers in previously
infected animals will decrease, seroconversion will not be evident in
the sentinels, and all virus isolation attempts will be negative. Thes
e criteria form the basis of the noncarrier pig.