C. Obled et al., THE SENSITIVITY OF HYDROLOGICAL MODELS TO SPATIAL RAINFALL PATTERNS -AN EVALUATION USING OBSERVED DATA, Journal of hydrology, 159(1-4), 1994, pp. 305-333
Spatial variability of rainfall is often considered as a major source
of temporal variability in the resulting basin hydrograph. Since direc
t experimental evidence is not available, this must be verified throug
h a modelling approach, provided adequate data are available. A semi-d
istributed version of TOPMODEL has therefore been applied to the Real
Collobrier experimental basin (71 km2 in southeast France with 21 reco
rding raingauges) using an hourly time step and a series of independen
t events. First, a set of reference results has been built under the a
ssumption of spatial uniformity for the rainfall. Two different densit
ies of network have been tested (including 5 or 21 gauges), showing a
significant advantage for the dense network rainfall estimate. Next, t
he spatial variability of the rainfall field has been tested and confi
rmed, with commonly a factor of 3 between simultaneous average rainfal
l over subcatchment areas of 6-8 km2. However, the model response refl
ects this spatial variability only in secondary peaks which are usuall
y an order of magnitude smaller than the bulk of the hydrograph and no
t always present in the observed discharges. An extended discussion co
nsiders if these results may be dependent on the model or on the setti
ng up of the numerical experiments. In fact, it seems that the spatial
variability of rainfall, although important, is not sufficiently orga
nized in time and space to overcome the effects of smoothing and dampe
ning when running off through this rural medium-sized catchment. Such
results may not hold for smaller urbanized areas or larger rural basin
s.