K. Sengoku et al., A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF GONADOTROPIN WITH OR WITHOUT GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST FOR TREATMENT OF UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY, Human reproduction, 9(6), 1994, pp. 1043-1047
The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) in combinat
ion with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovulation induction
has been advocated for the treatment, particularly by in-vitro fertili
zation (IVF) of various types of infertility. The present study was de
signed to compare the clinical efficacy of HMG alone with a short prot
ocol of GnRHa/HMG for treatment of unexplained infertility. A total of
91 couples with unexplained infertility were randomly assigned to one
of two treatments; either HMG with intra-uterine insemination (IUI) (
45 patients, 62 cycles) or GnRHa/HMG with IUI (46 patients, 69 cycles)
treatments. Progesterone concentrations on the day of human chorionic
gonadotrophin (HCG) administration were significantly higher in HMG (
1.5 +/- 0.9 ng/ml) versus GnRHa/ HMG (0.8 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P < 0.05) cyc
les. Furthermore, GnRHa suppressed the occurrences of premature lutein
ization (GnRHa/HMG 5.8% and HMG 24.2% respectively). However, there we
re no significant differences in HMG dose requirements, plasma oestrad
iol concentrations or follicular development on the day of HCG adminis
tration between the two groups. Nor were any significant differences f
ound in the pregnancy rates between the two treatment protocols (GnRHa
/HMG 13.0% and HMG 11.3% respectively). Our results suggest no benefic
ial effect of GnRHa/HMG compared to HMG alone for the treatment of une
xplained infertility, based on pregnancy rates.