R. Haessler et al., HIGH SPINAL-ANESTHESIA DOES NOT ALTER EXPERIMENTAL MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION SIZE OR ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 11(1), 1997, pp. 72-79
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Peripheal Vascular Diseas","Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Objective: The role of the central nervous system in the development o
f myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation in virgin and isc
hemically preconditioned myocardium was investigated. Design: Infarct
size and ventricular arrhythmias were assessed after regional ischemia
-reperfusion. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups: (1) preco
nditioned, central nervous system intact; (2) nonpreconditioned, nervo
us system intact; (3) preconditioned, nervous system blocked; and (4)
nonpreconditioned, nervous system blocked. Differences in hemodynamics
and infarct size were assessed with analysis of variance, and differe
nces in ventricular fibrillation were assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis
test. Setting: Experiments were performed in the Anesthesiology Resea
rch Laboratory at a medical center. Participants: Anesthetized open-ch
est New Zealand white rabbits were used for these studies. Interventio
ns: Rabbits underwent 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 3 ho
urs of reperfusion. The central nervous system was blocked with total
spinal anesthesia. Ischemic preconditioning was elicited with 5 minute
s of coronary artery occlusion and 10 minutes of reperfusion. Infarcti
on was assessed with tetrazolium and expressed as a percentage of the
risk zone (mean +/- SEM). Measurements and Main Results: Preconditioni
ng resulted in infarct size limitation compared with the control (8% /- 4% v 43% +/- 5%; p < 0.001) and delayed the onset of fibrillation (
15.5 minutes v 11 minutes; p = 0.001). Spinal blockade neither altered
nonpreconditioned infarct size nor attenuated preconditioning (32% +/
- 7% v 8% +/- 3%; p = 0.04), but it was associated with ventricular fi
brillation in 24/25 rabbits as compared with 6/14 rabbits without bloc
kade. In blocked animals, preconditioning resulted in a decreased dura
tion of fibrillation (2.5 minutes v 12.5 minutes; p = 0.0004). However
, spinal blockade eliminated the preconditioning-induced delay in fibr
illation (10 minutes v 22 minutes; p = NS). Conclusions: It is conclud
ed that (1) activation of efferent sympathetic nerves is not necessary
for ischemic preconditioning; (2) preconditioning delays the onset of
ventricular arrhythmias; and (3) spinal blockade exacerbates ischemia
-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders
Company.