IDENTIFICATION OF SMALL DUST IMPACTS IN THE ULYSSES DUST DETECTOR DATA

Citation
M. Baguhl et al., IDENTIFICATION OF SMALL DUST IMPACTS IN THE ULYSSES DUST DETECTOR DATA, Planetary and space science, 41(11-12), 1993, pp. 1085-1098
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Geosciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
00320633
Volume
41
Issue
11-12
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1085 - 1098
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-0633(1993)41:11-12<1085:IOSDII>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Since October 1990, 3 weeks after the launch of the Ulysses spacecraft , the dust detector onboard recorded impacts of cosmic dust particles. Besides dust impacts, the detector recorded noise from a variety of s ources. So far, a very rigid scheme had been applied to eliminate nois e from impact data. The data labeled ''big'' dust impacts previously l ed to the identification of interstellar dust and of dust streams from Jupiter. The analysis presented here is concerned with data of signal s of small amplitudes which are strongly contaminated by noise, Impact s identified in this data set are called ''small'' impacts. It is show n that dust impacts can be clearly distinguished from noise for most o f the events due to the multi-coincidence characteristics of the instr ument. 516 ''small'' impacts have been identified. For an additional 1 19 events, strong arguments can be given that they are probably small dust impacts. Thereby, the total number of dust impacts increases from 333 to 968 in the time period from 28 October 1990 to 31 December 199 2. This increase permits a better statistical analysis, especially of the Jupiter dust streams which consist mostly of small and fast partic les. Additional dust streams have been identified between the already known streams before and after Jupiter flyby. The dependence of the de flection from the Jupiter direction, the stream intensity and width on Jupiter distance support the assertion that they have been emitted fr om the Jovian system. The masses of the 635 ''small'' dust particles r ange from 6 x 10(-17) to 3 x 10(-10) g with a mean value of 1 x 10(-12 ) g, which compares to a range from 1 x 10(-16) to 4 x 10(-9) g with a mean value of 2 x 10(-11) g for the previously identified 333 ''big'' dust particles.