MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING DURING DOBUTAMINE STRESS FOR DETECTION ANDLOCALIZATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - QUANTITATIVE WALL-MOTION ANALYSIS USING A MODIFICATION OF THE CENTERLINE METHOD
Fp. Vanrugge et al., MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING DURING DOBUTAMINE STRESS FOR DETECTION ANDLOCALIZATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - QUANTITATIVE WALL-MOTION ANALYSIS USING A MODIFICATION OF THE CENTERLINE METHOD, Circulation, 90(1), 1994, pp. 127-138
Background Quantitative measurement of wall motion is essential to ass
ess objectively the functional significance of coronary artery disease
. We developed a quantitative wall thickening analysis on stress magne
tic resonance images. This study was designed to assess the clinical v
alue of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during dobutamine stress for
detection and localization of myocardial ischemia in patients with sus
pected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results Thirty-nine consec
utive patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease refer
red for coronary arteriography and 10 normal volunteers underwent grad
ient-echo MRI at rest and during peak dobutamine stress (infusion rate
, 20 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1)). MRI was performed in the short-axis plane a
t four adjacent levels. Display in a cine loop provided a qualitative
impression of regional wall motion (cine MRI). A modification of the c
enterline method was applied for quantitative wall motion analysis by
means of calculation of percent systolic wall thickening. Short-axis c
ine MRI images were analyzed at 100 equally spaced chords constructed
perpendicular to a centerline drawn midway between the end-diastolic a
nd end-systolic contours. Dobutamine MRI was considered positive for c
oronary artery disease if the percent systolic wall thickening of more
than four adjacent chords was <2 SD below the mean values obtained fr
om the normal volunteers. The overall sensitivity of dobutamine MRI fo
r the detection of significant coronary artery disease (diameter steno
sis greater than or equal to 50%) was 91% (30 of 33), specificity was
80% (5 of 6), and accuracy was 90% (35 of 39). The sensitivity for ide
ntifying one-vessel disease was 88% (15 of 17), for two-vessel disease
91% (10 of 11), and for three-vessel disease 100% (5 of 5). The sensi
tivity for detection of individual coronary artery lesions was 75% for
the left anterior descending coronary artery, 87% for the right coron
ary artery, and 63% for the left circumflex coronary artery. Conclusio
ns Dobutamine MRI clearly identifies wall motion abnormalities by quan
titative analysis using a modification of the centerline method. Dobut
amine MRI is an accurate method for detection and localization of myoc
ardial ischemia and may emerge as a new noninvasive approach for evalu
ation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.