B. Vernooij et al., SALICYLIC-ACID IS NOT THE TRANSLOCATED SIGNAL RESPONSIBLE FOR INDUCING SYSTEMIC ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE BUT IS REQUIRED IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION, The Plant cell, 6(7), 1994, pp. 959-965
Infection of plants by necrotizing pathogens can induce broad-spectrum
resistance to subsequent pathogen infection. This systemic acquired r
esistance (SAR) is thought to be triggered by a vascular-mobile signal
that moves throughout the plant from the infected leaves. A considera
ble amount of evidence suggests that salicylic acid (SA) is involved i
n the induction of SAR. Because SA is found in phloem exudate of infec
ted cucumber and tobacco plants, it has been proposed as a candidate f
ar the translocated signal. To determine if SA is the mobile signal, g
rafting experiments were performed using transgenic plants that expres
s a bacterial SA-degrading enzyme. We show that transgenic tobacco roo
tstocks, although unable to accumulate SA, were fully capable of deliv
ering a signal that renders nontransgenic scions resistant to further
pathogen infection. This result indicated that the translocating, SAR-
inducing signal is not SA. Reciprocal grafts demonstrated that the sig
nal requires the presence of SA in tissues distant from the infection
site to induce systemic resistance.