I. Chang et Sc. Lapham, VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED CRIMINAL OFFENSES AND TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS INSCREENING OF DRIVING-WHILE-INTOXICATED OFFENDERS, Alcohol and alcoholism, 31(6), 1996, pp. 583-590
Many jurisdictions in the USA, Canada and some European countries use
diagnostic methods to assess substance abuse problems of driving-while
-intoxicated (DWI) offenders, to address the concern that, during DWI
screening, offenders may not give accurate information on their crimin
al history and traffic violations to avoid referral to treatment. This
study was designed to validate self-reported data, to assess the need
for DWI agencies to access court records, and to obtain an offence pr
ofile for this population. DWI offenders (n = 274, mostly first-time)
were randomly selected from those who attended the Lovelace Comprehens
ive Screening Program (LCSP). The self-reported data were compared wit
h records retrieved from the Metropolitan Court in Albuquerque, New Me
xico, USA. Three-quarters of the offenders had had at least one offenc
e or traffic violation before this DWI arrest. Sixty-five per cent of
the offenders with court records underreported their records. The high
percentage of false self-reporting for a primarily first-time offende
r population indicates the need to use court records to verify self-re
ported data. For multiple offenders, who have a much higher rate of cr
iminal offences and traffic violations, checking self-reported data ag
ainst court records becomes more important. In addition, a questionnai
re based on offence profile information could be used to obtain a more
complete history of those offences.