Cf. Nicholson et al., ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF NUTRITIONAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR VENEZUELAN DUAL-PURPOSE CATTLE SYSTEMS, Journal of animal science, 72(7), 1994, pp. 1680-1696
Objectives of this study were to compare three nutritional management
strategies for dual-purpose herds in Venezuela in 1987 using a determi
nistic, multiperiod linear programming model of a representative farm.
The model maximized discounted net margin (total revenues minus varia
ble costs) from the herd for a 3-yr cow replacement cycle partitioned
into six periods. The periods accounted for seasonal variation in fora
ge availability and quality, and the model provided information about
optimal animal inventories, animal sales, land in forage, and feed sup
plements. We compared current nutritional management practices and alt
ernatives allowing optimal supplementation with commercial concentrate
, molasses, cassava root, and urea. Iteration between the programming
model and results from the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System
assured technical coefficients consistent with predicted animal perfo
rmance. Compared with management practices relying on commercial conce
ntrate, optimal use of molasses and urea permitted increases in the st
ocking rate. Productivity and profit were restricted primarily by ener
gy intake, which was constrained by intakes of NDF and DM. Alternative
management strategies changed the relative importance of nutrient req
uirements and feed intake constraints. Thus, optimal interventions to
alleviate nutritional constraints will vary with current management. M
obilizing adipose and protein tissues during lactation was optimal for
most strategies. Supplementing with molasses and urea instead of comm
ercial concentrate was the most profitable strategy, increasing herd n
et margin by 16% compared to the predominant feeding strategy in the l
ate 1980s.