PREDICTING NET ENERGY AND PROTEIN-REQUIREMENTS FOR GROWTH OF IMPLANTED AND NONIMPLANTED HEIFERS AND STEERS AND NONIMPLANTED BULLS VARYING IN BODY-SIZE

Citation
Tp. Tylutki et al., PREDICTING NET ENERGY AND PROTEIN-REQUIREMENTS FOR GROWTH OF IMPLANTED AND NONIMPLANTED HEIFERS AND STEERS AND NONIMPLANTED BULLS VARYING IN BODY-SIZE, Journal of animal science, 72(7), 1994, pp. 1806-1813
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
72
Issue
7
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1806 - 1813
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1994)72:7<1806:PNEAPF>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Energy and protein retained in 50, 38, and 54 nonimplanted Holstein an d Angus heifers, steers, and bulls, respectively, 17 pens (237 cattle) of beef breed implanted heifers, and 65 pens (535 cattle) of beef bre ed implanted steers were compared to values predicted by the 1984 Nati onal Research Council (NRC), Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein Syst em (CNCPS), and the model of Oltjen et al. (OLTJEN). The NRC accounted for 83, 85, 86, 88, and 88% of the variation in retained energy(RE) w ith biases of -8, +13, -6, +6, and -12% for nonimplanted heifers, impl anted heifers, nonimplanted steers, implanted steers, and bulls, respe ctively. The CNCPS accounted for 93, 98, 92, 95, and 91% of the variat ion in RE with biases of +2, +10, -6, +1, and -13% for nonimplanted he ifers, implanted heifers, nonimplanted steers, implanted steers, and b ulls, respectively. OLTJEN accounted for 78, 76, 48, 93, and 96% of th e variation with biases of -3, -2, +9, -8, and -1% for nonimplanted he ifers, implanted heifers, nonimplanted steers, implanted steers, and b ulls, respectively. For retained protein (RP), the NRC accounted for 5 7, 68, 70, 86, and 84% of the variation with biases of -12, -7, +16, - 8, and -10% for nonimplanted heifers, implanted heifers, nonimplanted steers, implanted steers, and bulls, respectively. The CNCPS accounted for 69, 77, 84, 94, and 84% of the variation in RP with biases of -7, -11, 0, -3, and -9% for nonimplanted heifers, implanted heifers, noni mplanted steers, implanted steers, and bulls, respectively. OLTJEN acc ounted for 51, 38, 0, 35, and 69% of the variation with biases of -23, -2, -31, -4, and -38% for nonimplanted heifers, implanted heifers, no nimplanted steers, implanted steers, and bulls, respectively. This ana lysis indicates that the CNCPS, which uses a weight adjusted for body size and sex in the NRC 1984 medium-frame steer equation, can be used to predict both RE and RP for all classes of cattle (implanted and non implanted heifers, steers, and bulls varying in body size) when their weights are adjusted to that equivalent to the body size steer represe nted by that equation.