Ep. Steinberg et al., VARIATION IN OPHTHALMIC TESTING BEFORE CATARACT-SURGERY - RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGISTS, Archives of ophthalmology, 112(7), 1994, pp. 896-902
Little information is available either for the clinical value of many
ophthalmic tests performed preoperatively in the evaluation of patient
s for cataract surgery of for variation in ophthalmologists use of suc
h tests. To assess variation in ophthalmologists' use of ophthalmic te
sts, we conducted a national survey of American Academy of Ophthalmolo
gy members. Thirty-three percent, 17%, 37% and 19% of the respondents
reported that they ''frequently'' or ''always'' perform glare testing,
contrast sensitivity testing, potential acuity measurement, and specu
lar microscopy, respectively, in patients being considered for catarac
t surgery who have no history of eye disease other than cataract. In c
ontrast, 27%, 54%, 24%, and 48% of respondents reported that they neve
r perform each of these four tests in such patients. Two ophthalmologi
st characteristics-a surgical volume of greater than 200 cataract extr
actions per year and performance of surgery in an ambulatory surgical
center or private office (as opposed to a hospital)-were independently
associated with an increased probability of performing each of these
four tests frequently or always. Ten percent of less of the respondent
s reported that they frequently or always perform electroretinography,
visual evoked response testing, photography of fundus or anterior seg
ment, B-scan ultrasonagraphy, formal color vision testing, and formal
visual field testing in such patients. Thus, there is considerable var
iation in ophthalmologists' use of glare testing, contrast sensitivity
testing, potential acuity measurement, and specular microscopy. A sma
ll percentage of ophthalmologists may be overusing several other tests
in the evaluation of patients being considered for cataract surgery.