Jl. Keltner et al., VISUAL-FIELD PROFILE OF OPTIC NEURITIS - ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP IN THE OPTIC NEURITIS TREATMENT TRIAL, Archives of ophthalmology, 112(7), 1994, pp. 946-953
Purpose: The purpose of this present study was to evaluate longitudina
l visual field information for 448 patients over their first year of f
ollow-up in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Methods: We reviewed 6
536 automated static visual fields performed on a visual field analyze
r (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer) at nine visits within the 1-year pe
riod for each of the patients. Results: The median values of the mean
deviations for affected eyes were as follows: -22.88 dB at baseline, -
1.94 dB at 6 months, and -1.62 dB at 1) ear. At 6 months, 51% of affec
ted eye visual fields were normal, and at 1 year 55.9% were normal. Ap
proximately two thirds (68.8%) of the fellow eyes were classified as a
bnormal at baseline, although the defects were generally slight. One t
hird (33.2%) were abnormal at 6 months, and approximately one third we
re still abnormal at 1 year. More than 87% of those abnormal at 6 mont
hs and at 1 year had been abnormal at baseline. Binocular analysis rev
ealed that 13.2% of patients showed a chiasmal or retrochiasmal type o
f field defect at least once during the year (5.1% bitemporal; 8.9% ho
monymous). Of the patients who showed a retrochiasmal visual field def
ect, 75.7% had an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging scan at baseline
compared with 46% of the rest of the patients in the Optic Neuritis T
reatment Trial (chi(2)=10.73, df=1, P<.002). Conclusion: Over the firs
t year of follow-up, the majority of patients with visual field defect
s from acute optic neuritis returned to normal, as measured by automat
ed static perimetry. Many fields showed variation in the pattern and l
ocation of the sensitivity loss. Chiasmal and retrochiasmal defects oc
curred more commonly than previously reported.