The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine if there is a diff
erence in microleakage between facial and lingual enamel and cementum
using two different evaluation techniques. Class 5 preparations were m
ade in 50 teeth on the facial and lingual tooth surfaces and restored
using dentin bonding and composite resin. The teeth were thermocycled,
silver nitrate stained, and longitudinally sectioned into mesial and
distal halves through each restoration. The mesial half was scored usi
ng a rank order system. A Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was performed.
The distal half was scored by measurement, and a two-sample t-test was
performed. There were no statistically significant differences (P gre
ater-than-or-equal-to 0.05) in microleakage between facial and lingual
tooth enamel or cementum surfaces using either measurement technique.