ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS ON THE OS CALCIS IN A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTERSTUDY

Citation
D. Hans et al., ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS ON THE OS CALCIS IN A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTERSTUDY, Calcified tissue international, 55(2), 1994, pp. 94-99
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism
ISSN journal
0171967X
Volume
55
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
94 - 99
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-967X(1994)55:2<94:UMOTOC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Ultrasonic assessment is a new approach to assess both quality and den sity. Two ultrasonic parameters are measured on the os calcis: the att enuation or broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and the velocity or speed of sound (SOS). The interunit variations in vitro and in vivo o f an ultrasound instrument, the Lunar Achilles(R) system, used in a Fr ench multicenter study named EPIDOS, were calculated and the stability of these intruments over a 12-month period was evaluated. A third par ameter called ''stiffness index,'' calculated from the SOS and BUA, wa s also used in this study. The average CV in vitro for the BUA and SOS was 0.92% and 0.12%, respectively, and the average CV in vivo for the BUA, the SOS, and the stiffness index was 1.83%, 0.23%, and 1.9%, res pectively. The interunit (or inter-machines) variations were calculate d by a one-way analysis of variance. We detected small but significant measurement differences among centers on a phantom for both SOS (maxi mum significant difference 0.4%) and stiffness (maximum significant di fference 3.5%) but not for BUA. Similar differences were found in vivo . The precision over 12 months of the interunit variations in vitro wa s evaluated by measuring a single phantom traveling from one center to another several times. The range of the CV for the BUA (1.54- 0.51%), for the SOS (0.25-0.14%), and for the stiffness index (2.26-1.10%) ar e explained in part by technical failures. The variation among the fiv e Achilles was estimated by the combined CV which was 1.42% for the BU A, 0.32% for the SOS, and 2.33% for the stiffness index. In conclusion , our findings indicate that equipment from one manufacturer appears t o be consistent between machines for the BUA, but not completely for t he SOS. The results for this stiffness index are necessarily influence d by both SOS and BUA. The shortterm and long-term interunit precision is good, both in vitro and in vivo. Such results provide increased co nfidence in multicenter clinical trials where ultrasonic data are pool ed.