I. Shima et al., TREATMENT FOR SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER BASED ON HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES AND GROSS APPEARANCE, International journal of oncology, 5(2), 1994, pp. 315-320
According to the depth of invasion, sixty-one superficial esophageal c
ancers (SECs) were subclassified as follows: intraepithelial cancer (e
p), mucosal cancer invading to the lamina propria mucosa (lpm), or to
the muscularis mucosa (mm), and submucosal cancer limited to the inner
one-third of the submucosal layer (sm1), to the middle one-third (sm2
), or invading into the outer one-third (sm3) to investigate the relat
ionship between the depth of invasion and gross type classified accord
ing to the Guidelines of the Japanese Research Society for Esophageal
Disease. Our results show that the SECs comprised of 9 ep cancers, 8 l
pm, 6 mm, 6 sm1, 19 sm2 and 13 sm3, none of the ep or lpm cancers had
either lymph node metastasis or recurrence and one-third of the mm and
sml cancers had metastasis only in the mediastinal nodes. One-third o
f the sm2 and sm3 cancers, otherwise, revealed nodal involvement at su
rgery, and one-fourth of those recurred postoperatively. Recurrence in
the cervical nodes was found in 9% of these cancers. All the SECs of
the gross types including protruding type, slightly elevated type more
than 2 cm in diameter and distinctly depressed type were submucosal c
ancers, whereas all the SECs showing the gross types including flat ty
pe and slightly elevated type less than 2 cm in diameter were ep or lp
m cancers. Therefore, we concluded that for SEC evaluated as flat or s
lightly elevated type less than 2 cm in diameter by the endoscopic exa
mination, less radical treatment such as endoscopic mucosal resection
(EMR) should be performed at first.