A sheargraph transmits normal and shear stresses to the soil via a spr
ing which is compressed and rotated. The compression and rotation are
recorded directly on conventional. rectilinear graph paper. However, t
he forces involved in compression and torsion of the spring in a shear
graph are not independent of one another. As a result, lines of equal
normal or shear stress are not parallel to the axes of rectilinear gra
ph paper. Calibration equations for the relationship between normal an
d shear stress and the compression and rotation of the spring contain
interaction terms. This paper describes a general form for these equat
ions which is shown to fit experimental calibration data reasonably we
ll. For a spring which is rotated during a test in the direction of co
iling (i.e. wound up). as is the case for the sheargraph used in this
paper, assuming independence of shear and normal stresses leads to an
underestimate of the soil shear strength compared with the correct cal
ibration. Conversely, a spring which is rotated opposite to the direct
ion of coiling (i.e. unwound), assuming independence of shear and norm
al stresses leads to an overestimate of the soil shear strength compar
ed with the correct calibration. Tests on a sand (which had a linear f
ailure envelope) and a silt loam (which had a curved failure envelope)
demonstrated a closer agreement with shear box results when the corre
ct calibration was used.