In a paper published in 1974, it was reported that uro-oxalic stones a
re found more often in subjects with group O than with group A blood t
ypes although the proportions of these two blood types are approximate
ly equivalent in the French population. The present work confirms thes
e data, the ratio of group O to group A renal lithiasis being approxim
ately 3 to 1. In a paper published in 1987, uro-oxalic stones were fou
nd to occur preferentially on the left side : 84 on the left and 39 on
the right. The present work confirms this notion since in 57 cases, s
tones were bilateral in 2 cases, on the left in 39 and on the right in
16. Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed in 40 of the
57 cases and showed that uro-oxalic stones are more resistant to shoc
k-waves than the other types of stones. They are about as hard as calc
ium oxalate monohydrate stones or harder in certain cases : A mean of
3 865 shock-waves were required in the 40 cases of the uro-oxalic lith
iasis treated with the HM3 Dornier device, while the mean number of sh
ock-waves required for all types of stones in general varies from 2 00
0 to 2 500. In 4 cases, 5 000 or 6 000 high power shock-waves (7 000 i
n one session and 9 500 in two sessions) had to be used to obtain a sa
tisfactory result. The calcium oxalate part of these stones is almost
always composed of calcium oxalate monohydrate. The uric acid part is
in general composed of anhydrous or bihydrated uric acid or red or yel
low-red sodium urate. In the last series, white ammonium rate stones w
ere spontaneously expelled whole or after lithotripsy fragmentation in
patients without any important infection. The proportion of uro-oxali
c stones, compared with all nephritic stones, was in 1974 approximatel
y 5 % nearly identical to that of uric acid stones. In 1994, the propo
rtion of uro-oxalic stones reached 9.8 % and the proportion of uric ac
id stones fell to 2 %. These observations raise important genetic, pat
hogenic and therapeutic questions.