B. Rasmussen et L. Angus, METAPHOR IN PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY WITH BORDERLINE AND NON-BORDERLINE CLIENTS - A QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS, Psychotherapy, 33(4), 1996, pp. 521-530
While the question of client individual differences in metaphor use ha
s been discussed in the case study literature, very fay empirical stud
ies have addressed this issue, particularly as manifested in the thera
peutic situation. In order to address this gap the present study under
took an intensive, qualitative analysis of both Borderline and non-Bor
derline client's and therapist's experiences of metaphoric expression
in a single psychotherapy session. The sample for this study consisted
of a single therapy session and postsession, open-ended interviews co
nducted with 2 therapists and 4 clients (2 Borderline; 2 non-Borderlin
e) who were actively engaged in psychoanalytically-oriented, long-term
psychotherapy. Three major subcategories: (i) metaphors illuminate cl
inical issues, (ii) metaphor functions to depict clients' self and obj
ect relationships, and (iii) therapist metaphor stimulates an intensif
ication of client experiential engagement in the therapy hour emerged
from the intensive analyses of the Inquiry interview transcripts. Patt
erns differentiating the Borderline and non-Borderline dyads in relati
on to metaphor use were discussed in the context of the two core categ
ories-the Representation Mode of Interaction and the Literal Mode of I
nteraction-which emerged from the qualitative analysis of the Inquiry
and therapy session transcripts.