Toxicity/carcinogenicity studies in rodents have played a pivotal role
in identifying chemicals that are potentially hazardous to humans. In
fact, nearly all of the known human carcinogens are also carcinogenic
in 1 or more rodent species. During the past 20 yr the quality and co
nsistency of rodent studies has improved considerably, and much has be
en learned about mechanisms whereby chemicals initiate or promote the
carcinogenic process in rats and mice. The process of identifying chem
icals that cause toxicity or carcinogenicity in rodents is quite well
established, but the procedures for extrapolating this data for risk m
anagement decisions in the protection of human health have lagged far
behind. While many would accept the assumptions that genotoxic chemica
ls that cause cancer in animals pose a cancer risk to humans and that
genotoxic chemicals causing cancer at high doses pose a risk at lower
doses, there is much less certainty with respect to nongenotoxic chemi
cals. The confusion about risk extrapolation for nongenotoxic chemical
s has often lead to criticism of the hazard identification process for
chemicals in general. There is increasing awareness of the complexity
of the carcinogenic process that has made species extrapolation and d
ose extrapolation from rodent studies to humans more complex. Although
newer molecular biological techniques and cell kinetic measurements o
ffer exciting possibilities for better risk assessment, it is the comb
ination of well-designed rodent studies with appropriate mechanistic s
tudies that offers the best hope for regulatory decisions based on sou
nd scientific principles.