Je. Bell et al., ANTENATAL DETECTION OF NEURAL-TUBE DEFECTS - COMPARISON OF BIOCHEMICAL AND IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE METHODS, Prenatal diagnosis, 14(7), 1994, pp. 615-622
The aim of this study was to determine whether identification of glial
cells in amniotic fluid samples could form a useful supplementary tes
t in the antenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects (NTDs). In a 5-yea
r study, 1452 samples of middle trimester amniotic fluid were examined
blind to the results of other antenatal diagnostic tests and to the o
utcome of pregnancy. Reasons for amniocentesis included raised serum a
lpha-fetoprotein (329), previous NTD (73), and a family history of NTD
s (7 1). Duplicate cytospin preparations were stained with Giemsa and
an antibody to glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and on this bas
is a prediction of fetal NTD status was made which was not communicate
d to clinicians. Subsequent management of pregnancies was influenced o
nly by the results of routine antenatal testing for NTDs. Twenty cases
of NTDs occurred among the 1406 cases in which the outcome was subseq
uently known. Of these 20 cases, only five (four anencephalic, one spi
na bifida) were correctly predicted by immunofluorescent identificatio
n of GFAP-positive cells in the amniotic fluid. The remaining 15 cases
(two anencephalic, 13 spina bifida) were not so identified. In a furt
her 18 cases, apparently GFAP-positive cells were identified in the ab
sence of NTDs. We conclude that GFAP immunofluorescence examination of
routine amniocentesis samples of amniotic fluid is not a useful predi
ctive test for NTDs.