Objective: A previous study empirically compared the effects of two HI
V-prevention interventions for men who have sex with men: (i) a safer
sex lecture, and (ii) the same lecture coupled with a 1.5 h skills-tra
ining group session. The skills-training intervention led to a signifi
cant increase in condom use at 12-month follow-up, compared with the l
ecture-only condition. The current study retrospectively assesses the
incremental cost-effectiveness of skills training to determine whether
it is worth the extra cost to add this component to an HIV-prevention
intervention that would otherwise consist of a safer sex lecture only
. Design: Standard techniques of incremental cost-utility analysis wer
e employed. Methods: A societal perspective and a 5% discount rate wer
e used. Cost categories assessed included: staff salary, fringe benefi
ts, quality assurance, session materials, client transportation, clien
t time valuation, and costs shared with other programs. A Bernoulli-pr
ocess model of HIV transmission was used to estimate the number of HIV
infections averted by the skills-training intervention component. For
each infection averted, the discounted medical costs and quality-adju
sted life years (QALY) saved were estimated. One- and multi-way sensit
ivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of base-case re
sults to changes in modeling assumptions. Results: Under base-case ass
umptions, the incremental cost of the skills training was less than $1
3,000 (or about $40 per person). The discounted medical costs averted
by incrementally preventing HIV infections were over $170 000; more th
an 21 discounted QALY were saved. The cost per QALY saved was negative
, indicating cost-savings. These results are robust to changes in most
modeling assumptions. However, the model is moderately sensitive to c
hanges in the per-contact risk of HIV transmission. Conclusions: Under
most reasonable assumptions, the incremental costs of the skills trai
ning were outweighed by the medical costs saved. Thus, not only is ski
lls training effective in reducing risky behavior, it is also cost-sav
ing.