The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine recently held, in Nadeau v. Rainbo
w Rugs, Inc., that a single incident of sexual harassment may be suffi
cient to create a hostile work environment. The author concludes, base
d on an analysis of the two leading United States Supreme Court decisi
ons in this area of the law, that the court's conclusion in Nadeau is
correct. Additionally, the author discusses the Nadeau court's observa
tion that the severity of harassing conduct may vary inversely with it
s pervasiveness, and suggests this standard as a useful tool in analyz
ing whether motions for summary judgment may, or should, be granted in
single-incident sexual harassment cases.