This paper extends the traditional theory of urban location to derive
a consistent model of inter- and intra-regional mobility. It demonstra
tes that the two are behaviorally distinct. Workplace and residence re
locations tend to be 'substitutes' in intra-regional mobility but are
'complements' in inter-regional mobility. PreVioUs empirical papers ha
ve neglected the theoretical foundations of intra-regional mobility. I
n consequence, they have made four types of analytical compromises: de
fined 'migration' as any change in residence location, used job change
s as proxies for workplace mobility, neglected commuting distances, an
d used estimation techniques that do not reveal the underlying behavio
r.