Jcjm. Veraart et al., DIGITAL PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY AND LIGHT-REFLECTION RHEOGRAPHY - A CLINICAL COMPARISON, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology, 20(7), 1994, pp. 470-473
BACKGROUND. Light reflection rheography (LRR) is appropriate for the g
lobal assessment of calf-pump insufficiency regardless of whether it i
s caused by varicosity, the post-phlebitic syndrome, or deep venous th
rombosis. The instrument has been increasingly used by many phlebologi
sts. Digital photoplethysmography (D-PPG) is a further development of
this well-established LRR. With this D-PPG instrument it is possible,
in contrast to LRR, to calibrate the reflected light. OBJECTIVE AND ME
THODS. To compare the venous refilling times of both the LRR and the D
-PPG when measured at the same time on the same leg. We also evaluated
the practical use of both instruments. In total we performed 152 simu
ltaneous measurements with both instruments. RESULTs. We found a stati
stically significant correlation when we compared the venous refilling
time of both LRR and D-PPG (r = .664; P <.001). The observed agreemen
t between both instruments for detecting a disturbed venous refilling
time (less-than-or-equal-to 25 seconds) is 92%. CONCLUSION. Both instr
uments seems to correlate as has been shown in this and other studies.
The D-PPG has the advantage of being more handy. Futhermore the refle
cted light is calibrated, which enables to compare intra- and interind
ividual measurements.