Jm. Blasco et al., EVALUATION OF ALLERGIC AND SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR DIAGNOSING BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS INFECTION IN SHEEP, Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(8), 1994, pp. 1835-1840
A total of 291 unvaccinated sheep from Brucella melitensis-infected fl
ocks were examined for delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses w
ith Brucellergene commercial allergen and with cold saline extract and
cytosol from rough B. melitensis 115, and their sera were tested in t
he rose bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT), and enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lipopolysaccharide. DTH reacti
ons were maximal after 72 h, with no intensity differences among aller
gens, inoculation sites (eyelid and tail), and doses tested. There wer
e no differences in the results recorded by visual inspection and palp
ation of inoculation sites, by measuring skin thickness with a caliper
, or by microscopic examination of samples taken at necropsy; Six days
after DTH testing, anergy was observed in 100% of the animals, and 10
0% reactivity was recovered only after 24 days. All animals were necro
psied, and thorough bacteriological searches were performed. The sensi
tivities found with the 140 animals from which B. melitensis was isola
ted were ELISA, 100%; DTH, 97.1%; RBT, 92.1%; and CFT, 88.6%. Those re
sults put into question the value of RBT and CFT as screening and conf
irmatory tests for sheep brucellosis and at least indicate that their
standardization should be modified. For 151 tested sheep from which B.
melitensis was not isolated, the percentages of positive animals were
ELISA, 100%; DTH, 94.0%; RBT, 57.6%; and CFT, 53.6%. All tests were n
egative for 100 tested sheep from Brucella-free flocks. The different
results of bacteriological and immunological tests suggest the usefuln
ess of developing indirect tests able to distinguish truly infected an
imals from those that have developed an immunological response.