T. Wiesak et al., EVALUATION OF IN-VITRO CULTURE CONDITIONS TO DEMONSTRATE PREGNANCY-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN LUTEAL FUNCTION IN THE PIG, Biology of reproduction, 51(2), 1994, pp. 254-261
This study was designed to evaluate the most effective in vitro cultur
e conditions for study of pregnancy-dependent changes in LH-stimulated
steroidogenesis in porcine luteal tissue. Mixed luteal cells recovere
d from the CL of cyclic (Day 12) and pregnant (Day 12 and 16) pigs wer
e incubated either in Eagle's minimum essential medium (MEM) or in MEM
supplemented with different concentrations of porcine or calf serum o
r BSA, or were incubated in a defined medium (DM) containing 2 mu g/ml
insulin, 40 ng/ml hydrocortisone, 5 mu g/ml transferrin, and 10(-7) M
thyroxine. Cultures were treated with various doses of porcine LH (0.
1, 1, 10, 100 ng/ml). Additionally, large and small luteal cells of Da
y 12 cyclic and pregnant pigs were incubated for 4 h in medium 199 sup
plemented with 2% porcine serum in the absence or presence of various
concentrations of LH. Overall, progesterone production by the luteal c
ells of Day 12 pregnant pigs was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than
that by cells of the cyclic pigs. However, the luteal cells of pregnan
t Day 16 pigs released significantly (p < 0.05) less progesterone than
the other groups. LH had a stimulatory effect (p < 0.001) on progeste
rone release by mixed luteal cells that was independent of the type of
medium supplementation or reproductive status. Porcine serum, calf se
rum, and BSA (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.05, respectively) also s
timulated progesterone production. However, the doses of porcine and c
alf serum or BSA that stimulated progesterone release were dependent o
n the reproductive status of the pig. Progesterone production by large
luteal cells always exceeded (p < 0.001) that of small cells and was
stimulated by LH (p < 0.007). Small luteal cells of both cyclic and pr
egnant (Day 12) gilts did not respond to LH treatment, and small lutea
l cells of cyclic pigs produced significantly (p < 0.04) more progeste
rone than those of pregnant pigs. Our results demonstrate differences
in the steroidogenic potential of the CL of pregnant and cyclic pigs o
n Day 12. LH influenced steroidogenesis in vitro in luteal cells obtai
ned from early-pregnant pigs and from pigs in the midluteal phase of t
he estrous cycle. Our data support the suggestion that an interaction
between small and large luteal cells enhances response to LH stimulati
on in vitro, but the exact physiological role of porcine small and lar
ge luteal cells still needs further study.