Jj. Hwang et al., SIGNIFICANT MITRAL REGURGITATION IS PROTECTIVE AGAINST LEFT ATRIAL SPONTANEOUS ECHO CONTRAST FORMATION BUT NOT AGAINST SYSTEMIC EMBOLISM, Chest, 106(1), 1994, pp. 8-12
The prevalence of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and the
occurrence of systemic embolism were prospectively studied in 176 cons
ecutive patients. All had significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and un
derwent transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) studies. Left ventricu
lography was performed in all patients to document the severity of MR.
The underlying causes of MR included rheumatic heart disease in 84 pa
tients, ruptured chordae tendineae in 37, mitral valve prolapse in 18,
infective endocarditis in 20, coronary artery disease in 8, congenita
l heart disease in 5, and dilated cardiomyopathy in 4. No patient was
found to have left atrial thrombus. Left atrial SEC was observed in th
ree patients (1.7 percent), all of whom had atrial fibrillation, conco
mitant mitral stenosis, and huge left atria. Color now mapping reveale
d that left atrial SEC was prominent in regions where the turbulent fl
ow of MR was not present. Systemic embolism occurred in ten patients (
5.7 percent), The underlying disease was infective endocarditis, rheum
atic heart disease, and dilated cardiomyopathy in 6, 3, and 1 patient,
respectively. The sites of embolization involved the central nervous
system in eight patients and the spleen in the remaining two. Three pa
tients with rheumatic heart disease and the one with dilated cardiomyo
pathy were in atrial fibrillation and had dilated left atria (diameter
>45 mm) when systemic embolism occurred. Only one patient with rheuma
tic heart disease was found to have left atrial SEC. The remaining six
, with infective endocarditis, all had sinus rhythm. In conclusion,lef
t atrial SEC or thrombus detected by TEE is uncommon in patients with
significant MR. Clinical conditions may be of help to identify the sub
sets of patients at higher risk for systemic embolism.