Objective: To determine if supplemental estrogens should be used as st
eroid-sparing agents in asthmatic women. Design: Case series. Setting:
Ambulatory care, community hospital. Patients: Volunteer sample of th
ree steroid-dependent asthmatic women. Intervention: Addition of conju
gated estrogens to existing asthma treatment. Main outcome measure: Ab
ility to decrease oral steroid requirement. Results: The mean age of t
he women was 55 +/- 11 years; two were former smokers (cases 1 and 2)
and one was a nonsmoker (case 3). One woman (case 3) was premenopausal
and noted worsening of her asthma before and during menses. The other
two women (cases 1 and 2) were postmenopausal. All three had been sym
ptomatic from their asthma for 13.2 +/- 17.6 years. Each woman was bei
ng treated with maximal doses of inhaled albuterol, inhaled steroids,
and therapeutic theophylline doses. Despite this aggressive management
, all three women required daily supplemental steroids (mean dose, 26.
7 +/- 11.5 mg of prednisone). Case 3 was started on a regimen of noret
hindrone/ethinyl estradiol 1/35, and cases 2 and 3 were begun on regim
ens of daily conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg. Over the next 12 to 24 wee
ks, the conditions of all three women were symptomatically improved an
d their steroid therapy was discontinued. In addition, steroid-associa
ted side effects of hypertension, weight gain, osteoporosis, and easy
bruising lessened. Conclusion: Although this new observation of the st
eroid-sparing effect of estrogens remains preliminary, further study m
ay help advance understanding of the mechanisms and treatment of asthm
a in women.