K. Takeuchi et al., GASTRIC-MOTILITY AND MUCOSAL ULCEROGENIC RESPONSES INDUCED BY PROKINETIC DRUGS IN RATS UNDER PROSTAGLANDIN-DEFICIENT CONDITIONS, Digestive diseases and sciences, 42(2), 1997, pp. 251-258
The present study was performed to examine whether gastric prokinetic
drugs may induce damage in the rat stomach under normal and prostaglan
din (PG)-deficient conditions. Male SD rats fasted for 18 hr were admi
nistered subcutaneously with three different prokinetic drugs such as
metoclopramide (3-60 mg/kg), ondansetron (0.3-3 mg/kg), and cisapride
(3-30 mg/kg). Half the number of these animals were pretreated with in
domethacin (5 mg/kg) subcutaneously for induction of PG deficiency in
the stomach. Administration of these drugs increased gastric motor act
ivity ia a dose-dependent manner and expedited gastric emptying at low
er doses than those affecting gastric motility; the potency of the hyp
ermotility effect was in the following order: metoclopramide = ondanse
tron > cisapride. None of these drugs alone caused gross damage in the
stomach, although whitish rough areas were observed in the gastric mu
cosa along the folds. In the rats pretreated with indomethacin, howeve
r, both metoclopramide and ondansetron provoked multiple hemorrhagic l
esions in the gastric mucosa. Indomethacin at this dose showed over 90
% inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity without causing any damage in
the stomach, and this PG-deficient effect was not affected by coadmini
stration with the prokinetic drugs. The mucosal ulcerogenic responses
induced by metoclopramide in the presence of indomethacin were signifi
cantly inhibited by prior administration of atropine (1 mg/kg) or PGE(
2) (300 mu g/kg) at doses that inhibited gastric hypermotility induced
by metoclopramide. These results suggest that: (1) gastric prokinetic
drugs induce damage in rat stomachs under PG-deficient conditions at
the doses that enhance gastric motility and emptying but not at the do
ses that expedite gastric emptying only, and (2) gastric hypermotility
has the potential to cause gross damage in the stomach, supporting th
e importance of gastric motility as a pathogenic element of gastric le
sions.