Examined a dual-axis model of coping that included both action (active
vs. passive) and social dimensions (prosocial vs. antisocial) of copi
ng strategies among a combined sample of students and community reside
nts. We developed an assessment device to represent the model and allo
w investigation. Mixed support for the model and instrument were noted
. Women were more prosocial than men in their coping, but no less acti
ve. Men were more likely to use antisocial and aggressive, but less as
sertive coping strategies than women. More prosocial, action coping st
rategies were also more likely to be related to greater sense of maste
ry and more liberal gender-role orientation. Antisocial and passive st
rategies tended to be related to lower mastery and more traditional ge
nder-role orientation. Active coping was related to lower emotional di
stress for men and women, but both prosocial and antisocial coping wer
e related to greater emotional distress for men, suggesting that men m
ay have a narrower band of beneficial coping strategies than do women.