A SURVEY OF CRP LAND IN MINNESOTA .2. WEEDS ON CRP LAND

Citation
Jg. Jewett et al., A SURVEY OF CRP LAND IN MINNESOTA .2. WEEDS ON CRP LAND, Journal of production agriculture, 9(4), 1996, pp. 535-542
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
ISSN journal
08908524
Volume
9
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
535 - 542
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-8524(1996)9:4<535:ASOCLI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) funded the conversion o f eroding cropland to grass or grass-legume cover that was not to be t illed, hayed, or grazed for 10 yr. It was not known what the species c omposition of CRP fields would be after years of minimal disturbance. Our objective was to document the presence and percentage groundcover of weeds in 151 CRP fields located in 10 Minnesota counties; including 108 Conservation Practice (CP)-1 (cool-season legumes and grasses) fi elds, 17 CP-2 (native grasses) fields, and 26 CP-10 (existing vegetati on) fields. Groundcover of each species present and of bare ground was scored in six 106-sq-ft sample plots per field. The most prevalent sp ecies were the primary noxious weed Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L .) Scop.], the secondary noxious weed quackgrass [Elytrigia repens (L. ) Desv. ex. Nevski], and the non- noxious weeds dandelion (Taraxacum o fficinale Weber.) and goldenrod (Solidago spp.). Weed percentage groun dcover was higher in CP-10 fields than in CP-1 or CP-2 fields, probabl y because many CP-10 stands were already thinning at the start of the CRP contract. Volunteer legumes and grasses were common in CP-10 field s. In CP-1 fields, legume and grass percentage groundcover usually was correlated negatively with weed percentage groundcover. Weed percenta ge groundcover and species richness were correlated positively Gopher mounding was correlated positively with the amount of bare ground and with the percentage groundcover of annual and biennial weed species. P rimary, secondary, and non-noxious weeds were each found in nearly 90% of the fields studied. Widespread presence of noxious weeds on CRP fi elds is a cause for concern. Weed control issues should be addressed i n planning a new CRP.