Ld. Macdonald et al., ACCEPTABILITY AND PERCEIVED EFFECTIVENESS OF A DISTRICT COORDINATING SERVICE FOR TERMINAL CARE - IMPLICATIONS FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE, Journal of advanced nursing, 20(2), 1994, pp. 337-343
As part of a randomized controlled trial of a new district co-ordinati
ng service for the care of terminally ill cancer patients, the activit
ies of the nurse co-ordinators and the acceptability and perceived eff
ectiveness of the service were assessed. Co-ordinators' activities wer
e self-recorded; professional caregivers completed a postal questionna
ire; and family carers were interviewed at home. Thirty-eight per cent
of patients allocated to the co-ordinators were not visited at home.
Overall, 41% of professionals had heard of the co-ordinating service a
nd 20% had been contacted. A third of relatives, whether allocated or
not to the co-ordinating service, felt that terminal care of their pat
ient was not well co-ordinated and that they did not know how to get t
he help they needed for their dying relative. It may be that the nurse
co-ordinators were unwilling or unable to relinquish their skills in
order to provide a 'broker' style of co-ordination. Perhaps less skill
ed co-ordinators would have been more successful. Moreover, the co-ord
inating service had no budgetary responsibility. Those concerned with
quality assurance in co-ordination of terminal care might consider the
skill mix and professional training of the co-ordinators as well as t
heir budgetary responsibilities and authority.