REVISED DISK DIFFUSION INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA FOR CEFACLOR, LORACARBEF, CEFPROZIL AND CEFIXIME WHEN TESTING HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE ON HAEMOPHILUS TEST MEDIUM
Gv. Doern et al., REVISED DISK DIFFUSION INTERPRETIVE CRITERIA FOR CEFACLOR, LORACARBEF, CEFPROZIL AND CEFIXIME WHEN TESTING HAEMOPHILUS-INFLUENZAE ON HAEMOPHILUS TEST MEDIUM, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 13(6), 1994, pp. 481-489
The aim of the current five-center collaborative study was to reassess
the interpretive criteria for cefaclor, loracarbef, cefprozil and cef
ixime previously adopted or proposed by the National Committee for Cli
nical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for disk diffusion susceptibility t
ests with Haemophilus influenzae on Haemophilus Test Medium (HTR I) ag
ar. MICs and zones of inhibition were determined using NCCLS methods,
HTM and two collections of strains of Haemophilus influenzae. One grou
p of strains consisted of 118 stock organisms taken largely from vario
us recent U.S. antibiotic resistance surveillance studies. The emphasi
s in this selected group of organisms was on strains that were beta-la
ctamase negative but ampicillin resistant (BLNAR) by some other mechan
ism. The second collection of test organisms consisted of 50 recent cl
inical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae obtained from each of the fi
ve participating study centers. This group was considered representati
ve of the type of Haemophilus influenzae currently recovered from clin
ical sources in the USA. Frequency distribution assessment and error-r
ate bounded analysis of scattergram comparisons of MICs and zone sizes
were used to develop the following zone diameters interpretive for di
sk diffusion susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae on HTM a
gar: cefaclor, greater than or equal to 20 mm (susceptible, S) and les
s than or equal to 16 mm (resistant, R); loracarbef, greater than or e
qual to 19 mm (S) and less than or equal to 15 mm (R); and cefprozil,
> 18 mm (S) and < 14 mm (R). The respective MIC correlates for all thr
ee antimicrobial agents were less than or equal to 8 mu g/ml (S) and 3
2 mu g/ml (R). For cefixime, a zone diameter size of greater than or e
qual to 21 mm was recommended to define the susceptible category, with
an MIC correlate of less than or equal to 1 mu g/ml. Only a susceptib
le category was defined for cefixime testing. These new interpretive c
riteria ha, e recently been adopted by the NCCLS.