D. Kotasek et al., DOSE-INTENSIVE THERAPY WITH AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN BREAST-CANCER, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 24(3), 1994, pp. 288-295
Background: Breast cancer is the commonest form of cancer in Australia
n women. Although approximately 50% of women with breast cancer achiev
e long term survival by current management methods, recurrent or metas
tatic disease is generally incurable. In addition, women with Stage II
disease with > 10 positive axillary lymph nodes and also women with l
ocally advanced disease (Stage III) have a poor survival even with adj
uvant therapy. Aims: To assess the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose
chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transpl
antation in women with both metastatic and poor prognosis primary brea
st cancer. Methods: Twenty-eight women with either metastatic(15) or p
oor prognosis (13) primary breast canter were enrolled in the study be
tween November 1988 to January 1993. PBSC were harvested using high-do
se cyclophosphamide (Cy) with or without granulocyte-colony stimulatin
g factor (G-CSF) and a myeloablative regimen of Cy, melphalan and carb
oplatin (CMCp) was used in the transplantation phase. Results: Optimum
numbers of stem cells were harvested in 85% of patients. The use of f
ive G/m(2) Cy plus G-CSF resulted in better PBSC yields and a signific
ant reduction in haematologic morbidity when compared to mobilisation
with Cy alone. Twenty-two women underwent 23 PBSC transplants (PBSCT).
There have been two early deaths due to sepsis. The predominant morbi
dities observed following high dose chemotherapy and transplantation h
ave been nausea, mucositis and diarrhoea. The median number of days to
discharge following infusion of PBSC was 15 (range 11-21). At a media
n follow up time of 1.1 years (range 0 months-3.6 years), 8/22 (36%) e
valuable patients remain alive and disease free while 14/22 (64%) have
relapsed or progressed or died. Conclusion: High-dose chemotherapy an
d autologous PBSCT is a potentially highly effective treatment of wome
n with metastatic and poor prognosis primary breast cancer. Randomised
studies are required to compare this form of therapy to more standard
forms of treatment in breast cancer.