LIGAND INTERACTION BETWEEN UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR AND ITS RECEPTOR PROBED WITH 8-ANILINO-1-NAPHTHALENESULFONATE - EVIDENCE FOR A HYDROPHOBIC BINDING-SITE EXPOSED ONLY ON THE INTACT RECEPTOR

Citation
M. Ploug et al., LIGAND INTERACTION BETWEEN UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR AND ITS RECEPTOR PROBED WITH 8-ANILINO-1-NAPHTHALENESULFONATE - EVIDENCE FOR A HYDROPHOBIC BINDING-SITE EXPOSED ONLY ON THE INTACT RECEPTOR, Biochemistry, 33(30), 1994, pp. 8991-8997
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00062960
Volume
33
Issue
30
Year of publication
1994
Pages
8991 - 8997
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-2960(1994)33:30<8991:LIBUPA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The cellular receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) is a glycolipid-anchored membrane protein thought to play a primary ro le in the generation of pericellular proteolytic activity, and to be i nvolved in cancer cell invasion and metastasis. This protein is compos ed of three homologous domains, the NH2-terminal of which is involved in the high-affinity binding (K-d approximate to 0.1-1.0 nM) to the ep idermal growth factor-like module of urokinase-type plasminogen activa tor (uPA). Here we report that intact uPAR binds the low molecular wei ght fluorophore 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonate (ANS) to form a 1:1 s toichiometric complex and that the resulting enhancement of the ANS fl uorescence probes the functional state of uPAR as judged by several in dependent criteria. First, the uPAR-mediated increase in ANS fluoresce nce can be titrated by uPA as well as by its receptor binding derivati ves (the amino-terminal fragment and the growth factor-like module). S econd, an anti-uPAR monoclonal antibody, capable of preventing uPA bin ding, can also titrate the uPAR-dependent ANS fluorescence whereas oth er antibodies not interfering with uPA binding are unable to exert thi s effect. Third, the dissociation profile of uPa-uPAR complexes as a f unction of increasing concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride closel y parallels the loss of the ANS binding site in uPAR. Finally, liberat ion of the NH2-terminal domain from uPAR by limited chymotrypsin cleav age after Tyr(87) leads to a loss of both enhanced ANS fluorescence an d high-affinity uPA binding. This latter effect, a 1500-fold decrease in uPA-binding affinity to isolated NH2-terminal domain, demonstrates that this domain of uPAR does not contain all the determinants necessa ry for uPA binding, possibly due to a requirement for interdomain inte ractions to either stabilize an active conformation of this domain or be directly involved in the binding process.