Recent studies by Geiger, Lettvin and Zegarra-Moran have proposed a ne
w non-reading test for the diagnosis of dyslexia, and a new method for
remediation. The latter involves the learning of a ''visual strategy'
'. On adult dyslexics the test was reliable and the remediation appare
ntly effective. The purpose of this study is to confirm the usefulness
of the remediation and test with children. Dyslexic children (3rd-6th
grade) were divided into two groups. The experimental group (9) was g
iven a new remedial regimen of practise. The control group (6) continu
ed the remedial process given in their school. After 3 months of pract
ising their separate regimens all the dyslexic children who were in th
e two groups were retested and compared. The ''experimental'' dyslexic
s improved in reading by 1.22 grade level on average while the ''contr
ol'' dyslexics improved by 0.17 grade on average. The form-resolving f
ield (FRF) plots narrowed significantly for the experimental dyslexics
while they changed little for the control dyslexics. At the end of th
e second testing the control dyslexics were also given the new regimen
of practise. Five months later all the dyslexic children were tested
for the third time. The initial control dyslexics who later practised
the regimen (2) improved in reading by 22.5 grades and their FRF plot
narrowed. The experimental dyslexics continued to improve yet further.
All the dyslexic who practised the new regimen started at an average
of 2.5 grades behind their expected grade/age level and after 8 months
were at an average 0.75 grades behind their expected grade/age level.
This is on average 1.75 grade level improvement in reading within 8 m
onths, a rate of improvement larger than that of ordinary reading subj
ects. The dyslexic children were compared with matched grade/age ordin
ary reading children for reference. The study confirms the usefulness
of the test and the applicability of the remediation method for childr
en. It also shows that improvement under that method is quite rapid.