C. Huang et Mo. Delacruz, THE EARLY STAGES OF THE PHASE-SEPARATION DYNAMICS IN POLYDISPERSE POLYMER BLENDS, Macromolecules, 27(15), 1994, pp. 4231-4241
The thermodynamics and the dynamics of incompatible polydisperse polym
er blends are analyzed. The free energy is constructed following the F
lory-Huggins approach, where the degree of incompatibility is characte
rized by the Flory interaction parameter chi. The Cahn-Hillard approxi
mation is used to analyze the early stages of spinodal decomposition d
ynamics of a polymer blend quenched into the unstable region. A blend
of polydisperse A polymers with the Schulz-Flory distribution and mono
disperse B polymers is analyzed by treating polymer A as a one-, two-,
and three-component system with a weight-average degree of polymeriza
tion and a polydispersity index, which we refer to as two-, three-, an
d four-component models, respectively. The thermodynamics and the dyna
mics of incompatible monodisperse A-monodisperse B polymer blends are
consistent no matter which model is used. When polymer A is polydisper
se, however, [S(k,t) - S(k,0)]/S(k,0), where S(k,t) is the characteris
tic structure function, is definitely different in the three different
models due to kinetic effects. The differences are dependent on the f
unctional form of the Onsager coefficients. For wavevector-independent
Onsager coefficients, the reduced wavevector for which [S(k,t) - S(k,
0)]/S(k,0) is a maximum, k(peak) is always equal to 1/square-root 2 i
n the two-component model, while k(peak) increases as x increases in
the three- and four-component models. While for wavevector-dependent O
nsager coefficients, k(peak) decreases as chi increases in the three
different component models. As chi --> infinity, the difference in k(p
eak) between two- and three-component models and between three- and f
our-component models is 0.05 and 0.02, respectively, independent of th
e weight-average degree of polymerization when the polydispersity inde
x of polymer A is equal to 2.0. When the polydispersity index of polym
er A is reduced to 1.5, the difference in k(peak) becomes 0.04 and 0.
01, respectively.