Objectives. To assess the feasibility of telerobotic assisted surgery.
Methods. In a laboratory model, a cholecystectomy, splenectomy, and n
ephrectomy were performed by an inexperienced surgeon who was being me
ntored by an experienced surgeon stationed at a remote site. The remot
e surgeon controlled the laparoscopic camera by utilizing a teleroboti
c system. In patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, varix ligation, a
nd bladder suspension were performed by an experienced team utilizing
a robotic system controlled by an experienced surgeon from a remote si
te. Results. In both the laboratory and clinical setting, all procedur
es were successfully completed without complications. Conclusions. Cur
rent technology is available to successfully allow for telerobotic ass
isted surgery.