Ms. Simonson et A. Rooney, CHARACTERIZATION OF ENDOTHELIN RECEPTORS IN MESANGIAL CELLS - EVIDENCE FOR 2 FUNCTIONALLY DISTINCT ENDOTHELIN BINDING-SITES, Molecular pharmacology, 46(1), 1994, pp. 41-50
Endothelin (ET) peptides are growth factors that bind to G protein-cou
pled receptors and serve as a useful model to study mitogenic signal t
ransduction by vasoactive peptides. To begin to define the molecular m
echanisms underlying mitogenic signaling by ET-1, we analyzed expressi
on of ET receptor subtypes in glomerular mesangial cells and antagonis
m of ET-1-induced mitogenic responses by ET receptor antagonists. Comp
etitive displacement analysis of I-125-ET-1 binding revealed a shallow
multicomponent curve consistent with the presence of two ET-1 binding
sites (K-d values of 32 pM and 1.2 nM). Nonlinear regression analysis
demonstrated that a two-site model fit the data better than a one-sit
e model (p = 0.0063). Analysis of I-125-ET-1 binding sites by affinity
cross-linking revealed incorporated radioactivity in two distinct pro
tein bands in mesangial cell membranes. Both ET(A)-specific (BQ 123) a
nd nonselective (PD 142893/PD 145065) receptor antagonists displaced I
-125-ET-1 from the low affinity site. The K-i values for BQ 123 and PD
145065 were similar to the IC50 values for inhibition of ET-1-induced
increases in the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+](i)) by
these antagonists. The ET(B)-specific ligands S6c and [Ala(1,3,11,15)
]ET-1(6-21) were unable to displace I-125-ET-1 from either low affinit
y or high affinity binding sites. Analysis of ET receptor mRNA by reve
rse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, using primers predicted f
rom DNA sequences conserved through evolution in ET(A) and ET(B) genes
, demonstrated that mesangial cells express demonstrated that mesangia
l cells express a canonical ET(A) receptor. Collectively, these data s
uggest that the low affinity, high capacity I-125-ET-1 binding site is
an ET(A) receptor and that the high affinity, low capacity site is no
t accounted for by canonical ET receptors. We further demonstrated tha
t BQ 123 and PD 142893/PD 145065 inhibited ET-1-stimulated [H-3]thymid
ine uptake but at higher concentrations than required for inhibition o
f [Ca2+](i) increases. Preincubation (as opposed to coincubation) with
antagonists was required to inhibit ET(A)-mediated increases in [Ca2]i produced by ET-1. These results suggest that the unique, nearly irr
eversible binding of ET-1 to ET(A) receptors explains why high concent
rations of ET receptor antagonists are required to block longer term a
ctions such as mitogenesis.