Ga. Slafer et Hm. Rawson, SENSITIVITY OF WHEAT PHASIC DEVELOPMENT TO MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS - A REEXAMINATION OF SOME ASSUMPTIONS MADE BY PHYSIOLOGISTS AND MODELERS, Australian journal of plant physiology, 21(4), 1994, pp. 393-426
In this review we assess the universality of several assumptions that
are commonly made about development in wheat. The assumptions tested a
re that: (1) wheat is most sensitive to the environmental variables of
temperature and photoperiod during the vegetative period; (2) any res
ponses to vernalisation and photoperiod are complete by the time that
the apex has become reproductive and the stems begin to elongate; (3)
cultivars differ little in their responses to temperature aside from a
ny responses to vernalisation; (4) cultivar differences in 'intrinsic
earliness' or 'basic development rate' are unaffected by temperature;
(5) photoperiod and vernalisation responses are quantitative and that
these responses are well understood and can be generalised. We show th
at, in terms of development, all wheats are responsive to temperature
throughout their life cycles though to differing degrees, most are res
ponsive to photoperiod at least until heading and, contrary to expecta
tions, with potentially increasing sensitivity once the flowering proc
ess is triggered, and many are responsive to a memory of vernalising t
emperatures to well beyond the double ridge stage. In all these respon
ses we show that there is considerable genotypic variation and that it
is usually difficult to guess the responses of one genotype to the ma
in environmental variables from the responses of another. This is part
ially because overall sensitivity to each of the main variables can di
ffer, and the responses can be interactive, but also because the prima
ry responses and interactions can differ between developmental phases.
This can result in a high level of complexity of response whenever an
y variable is changed. The level of complexity is a negative feature w
hen it comes to modelling and forecasting responses across widely diff
ering environments but a highly positive feature when considering the
enormous genotypic variation available for selection.