Purpose: To prospectively and comprehensively compare the clinical res
ults of two small-incision cataract surgery procedures, silicone intra
ocular lens (refractive index of 1.46) implantation through a 3.2-mm i
ncision and polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens implantation throu
gh a 5.5-mm incision. Methods: Two hundred eyes with cataract randomly
were assigned to either procedure. Except for incision size, identica
l surgical methods were used in every case. Data on uncorrected and co
rrected visual acuity, keratometry, corneal topography, flare-cell mea
surement, fluorophotometry, specular microscopy, glare disability meas
urement, and photographic examination of intraocular lens decentration
were analyzed up to 6 months after surgery. Results: Eyes in the 3.2-
mm incision group displayed significantly better uncorrected and corre
cted visual acuity in the early postoperative period, lower aqueous fl
are intensity and cell counts immediately after surgery, less operativ
ely induced astigmatism throughout the study period, and less corneal
topographic changes taken 3 months after surgery. No significant betwe
en-group differences were noted for other parameters. Complications in
the two groups were few and comparable. Conclusion: Both procedures o
f small-incision cataract surgery offered satisfactory clinical result
s, but 3.2-mm incision cataract surgery allowed significantly earlier
recovery of visual function and better preservation of corneal shape.