Objective: To determine how residency programs are responding to the s
hift of neurological practice into the outpatient setting. Design: A n
ine-item questionnaire was sent to the directors of all US neurology r
esidency programs. Each item had two parts, the first describing the c
urrent program, and the second describing an ''ideal'' program designe
d to optimize resident education. The same questionnaire was also sent
to all house officers and faculty associated with a single residency
program to assess variability in perceptions. Setting: United States n
eurology residency programs (mail survey). Participants: Directors of
neurology residency programs and all house officers and faculty member
s at a single residency program. Results: Eighty-one (70%) of the 116
questionnaires distributed were returned. There were four areas of gen
eral consensus among the program directors: (1) more time should be de
voted to outpatient care during residency training; (2) more continuit
y at the resident level should be provided for patients seen in subspe
cialty clinics, (3) faculty should provide more supervision of residen
ts when they see follow-up patients; and (4) conferences specifically
directed at outpatient management issues should be developed. Conclusi
ons: Neurology residency directors agree that current approaches to te
aching in the outpatient setting fall short of an educationally ideal
system. Four areas of perceived deficiency have been identified. Creat
ive solutions will be necessary to correct these perceived deficiencie
s.