Study objective: Pulse oximetry has been reported to be falsely elevat
ed in the presence of carbon monoxide (CO). However, the degree to whi
ch pulse oximetry overestimates measured oxyhemoglobin saturation (O2H
b) has not been investigated in patients with CO exposure. This study
quantifies the effect of CO on pulse oximetry and O2Hb in a series of
patients with elevated carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels. Methods: A pro
spective case series of 25 pulse oximetry measurements, with concurren
t arterial blood gas sampling, were obtained on 16 adults with CO expo
sure. Results: COHb levels (mean, 16.1%; SD, 11.6%; range, 2.2% to 44%
) did not significantly correlate with pulse oximetry saturation (mean
, 97.7%; SD, 1.5%; range 96% to 100%) (r=.45; P=.1 [NS]). Compared wit
h COHb, a pulse oximetry gap (mean, 17.5%; SD, 1.5%; range, 2.3% to 42
%), defined as pulse oximetry saturation minus O2Hb, yielded a linear
regression model: pulse oximetry gap=1.82+0.94xCOHb (SEM=0.07; F=204;
R2=.90; p<.0001). Conclusion: Oxygen saturation as measured by pulse o
ximetry failed to decrease to less than 96% despite COHb levels as hig
h as 44%. Regression between the pulse oximetry gap and COHb suggests
that pulse oximetry overestimates O2Hb by the amount of COHb present.
Pulse oximetry is unreliable in estimating O2Hb saturation in CO-expos
ed patients and should be interpreted with caution when used to estima
te oxygen saturation in smokers.