Tm. Ienna et Dc. Mckenzie, THE ASTHMATIC ATHLETE - METABOLIC AND VENTILATORY RESPONSES TO EXERCISE WITH AND WITHOUT PREEXERCISE MEDICATION, International journal of sports medicine, 18(2), 1997, pp. 142-148
To determine whether asthmatic athletes have normal physiological resp
onses to exercise without pre-exercise medication, we studied 17 femal
e and male asthmatic subjects, 9 highly trained (HT) and 8 moderately
trained (MT) under 2 conditions: salbutamol (S) 200 mu g taken via inh
aler 15 minutes prior to exercise or placebo (PL). The exercise task w
as 4 continuous 5 minute increments representing 25, 50, 75 and 90% of
the subject's VO(2)max. VO2, minute ventilation (V-E), respiratory ex
change ratio (RER), % saturation (SaO(2)), and HR were continuously me
asured during exercise. Blood lactate (LA) was measured each minute th
roughout exercise and recovery. Post-medication, exercise; and recover
y measurements of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) were made using a
Mini-Wright flow meter. No differences, (p > 0.05) between treatment c
onditions were found at any stage of exercise with respect to VO2, V-E
, RER, HR and SaO(2). However, among the HT group the mean HR for the
4 exercise conditions was significantly higher under PL (PL = 151.7; S
= 147.2; p = 0.01). No difference was found in LA during exercise or
in recovery, Pre-exercise PEFR was significantly higher when pretreatm
ent was S (S = 582; PL = 545 l . sec(-1); p = 0.003). During the exerc
ise and recovery conditions mean PEFR measures were significantly high
er (S = 600.1; PL = 569.6; p = 0.002) with the S treatment. Bonferroni
's test detected a difference in PEFR measures between S and PL at 25%
and 50% VO(2)max and 3 and 15 minutes into recovery. There was no dif
ference in the physiological response to exercise between groups based
on training status, It was concluded that although S affects the PEFR
, these asthmatic athletes do not have altered metabolic or ventilator
y responses during this incremental exercise protocol.