By taking East Anglia as a regional case study this article places the
allotment in a social and parochial context. It therefore challenges
some of Moselle's assumptions and economic reductionist conclusions by
arguing that landlords and clergymen were the main providers and, as
a consequence, this created farmer antipathy. It maintains that issues
relating to paternalism, social control, the gift relationship and, m
ost importantly, rural unrest need to be examined in order to understa
nd the conflicting attitudes of labourers, farmers, and landlords.