Pd. Feaver, THE CIVIL-MILITARY PROBLEMATIQUE - HUNTINGTON, JANOWITZ, AND THE QUESTION OF CIVILIAN CONTROL, Armed forces and society, 23(2), 1996, pp. 149
The alleged crisis in American civil-military relations has revived a
long-standing theoretical debate about the determinants of civilian co
ntrol. So far, the debate has followed Lines of analysis laid by the o
riginal dispute between Samuel Huntington and Morris Janowitz. Viewed
from a post-Cold War perspective, however, neither model is attractive
. In this article, I define the basic problematique both the Huntingto
nian and Janowitzean theories attempt to explain: how to reconcile a m
ilitary strong enough to do anything the civilians ask them to with a
military subordinate enough to do only what civilians authorize them t
o do. Next I critically evaluate and call into question the continued
validity of key propositions of each theory and especially their relia
nce on ''professionalism.'' The article concludes with a brief summary
of the criteria that should guide the development of a new theory of
civilian control.